Classifying clothing: the quest for the non-orientable tank top.
When I walk down the street, I create patterns in how I walk, often by controlling my stride length so I will step on cracks every third sidewalk square, or whatnot. If I were a true master, my stride length would be incommensurable with respect to the sidewalk length—surely this was the problem that forced irrationalities upon the Greeks…
Anyway, I was also happy to realize (at a recent retreat) that clothing is nicely categorized by how many disks must be removed from a sphere to produce the particular clothing item. For some examples, consider:
- A sock or a hat is a sphere minus a disk.
- A headband (or tube top) is a sphere minus two disks.
- Jeans are a sphere minus three disks (the fabled “pair of pants”).
- A shirt is a sphere minus four disks (the “lantern”).
- A bathing suit is a sphere minus five disks.
- A fingerless glove might be a sphere minus six disks.
- Two fingerless gloves connected by a band is a sphere minus 11 disks.
Another lovely example is that of some scarves, which are a projective plane minus a disk (i.e., a Mobius strip), and therefore sit flat against one’s neck. I would be very interested in owning more non-orientable clothing (someone, somewhere, must own a non-orientable tank top—though perhaps that mythical object would be too annoying to be allowed to exist).
Posted: January 22nd, 2007 under Personal.
Comments: 2
Comments
Comment from Jana
Time: January 22, 2007, 6:15 pm
That was the most annoying thing I have ever read. Thank you for stealing 20 seconds of my life. I hope you are happy.
Comment from Romanadvoratrelundar
Time: February 21, 2007, 10:09 am
And yet, the post was orientable.
Write a comment